SL (a contributor to Qwora) & M (Martin)
SL. Consciousness is the most foundational pre-requisite for science.
M. This is obvious, as also that consciousness is a pre-requisite for all human transactions – language, literature, etc., etc.
SL. I believe that consciousness should be included as a part of science and not as something separate.
M. No, because consciousness is a metaphysical entity not amenable to scientific (empirical) investigation, which is quantitative and measurable..
SL. … we ourselves are part of that universe, and our experience is a tiny fragment of the experience of the larger universe around us.
(Qwoting) “What we call ‘experiences’ is usually equated with the experiential phenomena – with the experiential contents as such – again, with what exists in being subjectively experienced. Now the point is: consciousness (in the Advaitic sense) is the very subjective experiencing itself. It is, as the Advaitins formulate, the witnessing of the experiences.” – ‘On the Advaitic Identification of Self and Consciousness’, Wolfgang Fasching.
M. Now, that is metaphysical or philosophical – prior to or other than empirical science.
SL. “To admit that we are matter and mechanism is to ground ourselves in the wholeness of the cosmos. In the new physics, self coalesces from the stuff of the stars, exists briefly… ” (quoting ‘Skeptics and True Believers’).
M. This is not even science – it is a physicalist or materialist philosophical position.