sarUpa budhirjagatIshvare cha
sarUpa dhIrAtmani yAvadasti
arUpa Atma yadi kaH prapashyet
sA dRRiShtirekA anavahirhi pUrNA
sarUpa budhiH = the notion they have a form; jagatIshvare cha = in the world
and Ishvara; sarUpa dhIH = notion that Truth has a form; Atmani = in one self;
yAvat = as long as; asti = is there; arUpa Atma = if self iswithout form; yadi = if
(one has knowledge); kaH = who; prapashyet = sees; sA dRRiShtiH = that
vision; ekA = alone; anavadhiH = infinite; hi = indeed; pUrNA = full
As long as, in oneself one has the notion of being with form, i.e. as long as one is identified to the body mind, so long, the world and Ishvara also will be considered to be with form. If the self is without form, who sees? That vision, indeed is infinite and full.
It is the identification with the body which gives rise to different notions about oneself and the world. If one considers oneself limited to the body and mind then, naturally, the world and Ishvara are separate from him. Being separate, they are then limited and hence with form. So, a person having the wrong notion of oneself being the body will see a world which is limited.
Continue reading