16.45 to 16.50 Earlier the author has refuted different theories of the Buddhists. Advaita and Samkhya are similar in some respects and dissimilar in other aspects. The author refutes some theories of Samkhya philosophy. According to Samkhya, both purusha (consciousness), and prakriti (material and inert) are real. Purusha is action-free and unattached. Prakriti works for purusha and the latter is the enjoyer. There are many purushas, one for every jiva. Prakriti has three constituents, sattva, rajas and tamas. Samkhya further says that prakriti alone is the cause of creation. Purusha has no role. When the constituents are in equilibrium, the creation is unmanifest. Creation unfolds due to imbalance in three constituents.
Tag Archives: qualifications
Self Seeking – AI Review

For those potential readers who are unsure what is covered by this book, here is an overview summary by Dennis-AI in lieu of an answer to one of the many (none) questions posed by readers:
The book Self Seeking functions as a guide for seekers overwhelmed by the variety of modern non-dual teachers, providing criteria for identifying authoritative sources while highlighting the fundamental flaws in non-traditional teaching methodologies. The paramount concern of the text is how a seeker can attain Self-knowledge (jñāna), which alone removes ignorance and results in liberation (mokṣa),
Continue readingVedanta the Solution – Part 58

VEDĀNTA the solution to our fundamental problem by D. Venugopal
Part 58 continues the detailed explanation of the process of shravaNa, manana and nididhyASana.
There is a complete Contents List, to which links are added as each new part appears.
Vedanta the Solution – Part 57

VEDĀNTA the solution to our fundamental problem by D. Venugopal
Part 57 explains why the prescribed qualifications cannot be bypassed and begins a detailed explanation of the process of shravaNa, manana and nididhyASana.
There is a complete Contents List, to which links are added as each new part appears.
Revision of ‘Review of article on Shankara’ – Part 5
A tarka (reasoning, argumentation) is required for the analysis of anubhava, as both SSS and RB (the author) agree – consistent with Shankara’s position. That is, language and thought, needless to say, have a role to play, chiefly for exposition and analysis.
However, after two long, dense paragraphs RB contends: “If the tarka required to examine anubhava is itself completely dependent on ´sruti, then by no means is anubhava the ‘kingpin’ of pram¯an.as.”
Prior to this, SSS was quoted as maintaining that “for this unique tarka all universal anubhavas or experiences (intuitive experiences) themselves are the support.” The author states that this affirmation involves circular argumentation, and that to say that Shankara interprets the Vedas as being consistent with anubhava is wrong, the truth being the other way around, anubhava is consistent with the Vedas: “it should be clear that according to Sure´svar¯ac¯arya, the direct realization is directly from just ´sruti itself, thus satisfying the criteria for it to be a pram¯an.a…. The direct realization of the self is from ´sruti alone.” Continue reading